Archive for 2. Januar 2023

Haiti as a scapegoat for HBV vaccination experiment?

Januar 2, 2023

When a mysterious disease of the immune system among homosexuals was noticed in New York, San Francisco and Los Angeles in 1981, the first suspicion, for very understandable reasons, fell on an experimental hepatitis B vaccination campaign that was carried out from 1978 to 1980 with 1,038 homosexuals as a voluntary test group.

That (first and only) plasma vaccine in history was made from the plasma of homosexuals suffering from hepatitis, i.e. precisely from the blood of the first AIDS risk group (which was of course still unknown at the time). Research with chimpanzees played a central role in the development of the vaccine.

In 1984 in the US, 70% of AIDS victims were homosexuals, 17% heroin addicts, 2% hemophiliacs, 5% Haitians. However, despite the strong suspicion regarding the plasma vaccine experiment in what was by far the largest risk group (70%), Fauci, who was already the top health bureaucrat at the time, pointed the finger at the much smaller risk group of Haitians (5%) and an “African Connection”.

Fauci claimed at minute 31 that Zaire (now Congo) had the same AIDS rate as then San Francisco. True, this statement is not literally wrong. In fact, in 1984 a figure of 5,000 infected people in the Congo was assumed. But just as much for the entire Congo as for San Francisco alone. Fauci’s testimony, however, created the impression (presumably deliberately) that all of Congo was like the AIDS hotspot of San Francisco. It is true that older HIV infections were actually detected later in the Congo. However, it is by no means certain whether these HIV infections were natural precursors to the American pandemic.

Until the emergence of AIDS in the US, there were only sporadic cases in Africa. AIDS only became a pandemic in Africa in the late 1980s. And not in the Congo, but mainly in southern Africa, where the plasma vaccine (after sales in the USA had stopped in 1985) was delivered as a „Gift of Merck“ to „protect“ children until the mid-1990s.

The Haiti thesis is based on the assumption that Haitian UN employees, who would have come to the country as experts after the Belgian colonial power had left, would have contracted the disease there and then brought the disease back to Haiti on their return.

That thesis is allegedly confirmed by the molecular structure of 5 HIV samples from Haitian immigrants in 1982. However, there are no older samples from Haiti to actually show that the Haitian HIV strain should be older than the American one. In fact, molecules cannot tell what country they came from unless older samples can be found to refer to. The oldest American samples do not come from Haitians, but from US participants in the 1978 hepatitis study.

There is another very strong argument against early unnoticed contagion in Haiti. A plasma center for the American market was operated in Haiti in the 1970s. Plasma donors were members of the typical AIDS risk groups. If Haiti had been infected in the 1970s, American hemophiliacs (rather than homosexuals) would have been the first at-risk group as recipients of Haitian plasma donations.

The science bureaucrat became a hero of science for his diversion from the vaccine experiment, even though cover-ups and speculative finger-pointing at Haiti and Africa are the antithesis of science.

Not only the Haitians, who had probably been infected by American sex tourists in the late 1970s, were badly played with, but also the homosexuals themselves, who had served as guinea pigs and then ended up with an extremely stigmatizing „self-blame“ disease.

Why weren’t homosexual associations demanding much more vehemently that the vaccination campaign, which was suspected at the beginning, be clarified?

The homosexual associations, which were very young at the time, were heavily involved in the vaccination series and viewed and supported the campaign as a noble and good project for the benefit of the young community, which was still heavily discriminated against. They had been made into accomplices who didn’t dare question the good cause they were committed to along with the nice doctors.

Here we are back in the present. Anyone who has campaigned for the vaccination or even enforced it with coercive measures can hardly turn back, even if they themselves should become a victim. Like the homosexual organizations in the HBV vaccine experiment, our establishment has been made an accomplice. Should our corona vaccination experiment go wrong like the HBV vaccination experiment, our establishment would probably react in a similar way to how the homosexual associations reacted to HIV.